Birds eye view of Boston Street (source: bing.com) |
What this means is that the current configuration of Boston
Street - which became a fast moving 4-lane, suburban-style arterial roadway about
twenty years ago - will eventually be transformed into a 2-lane urban waterfront
street with exclusive space for the light rail, bike lanes, and enhanced
pedestrian facilities and landscaping. The new configuration will calm traffic
along Boston Street by discouraging speeding, while encouraging more walking,
biking, outdoor lingering, café dining, and transit use along the corridor.
A New Day
Selecting the Boston Street Completes Street option is a
testament to the courage and leadership of the Baltimore Department of Transportation
(BDOT), which, in recent years, has been willing to take some chances on progressive
initiatives aimed at making the city more livable and less traffic-dominated.
The idea of “Complete Streets” is simple: streets should
serve multiple modes of travel equitably, not just facilitate vehicle traffic
at the expense of everything else. A Complete Streets movement has emerged nationally and is helping communities become safer, more attractive, and more
economically viable over the long term. Locally, the Baltimore City Council,
like a growing number of municipalities across the country, recently adopted a Complete
Streets Resolution.
BDOT’s commitment to Complete Streets principals has been
evident with recent initiatives that include creation of downtown bike/bus-only
lanes, green bike lanes, installation of shared bike lane symbols or sharrows, a contra-flow bikes lane on Lanvale and Fawn Streets, a “bicycle boulevard” (the first on the East Coast!)currently under construction along Guilford Avenue, and plans for an expanded
network of bicycle lanes and cycle tracks throughout the city. BDOT is even
developing a Complete Streets Guide to help formalize these progressive policy
and design practices.
Baltimore’s willingness to break free from the status quo by
implementing innovative Complete Streets policies that promote transit,
bicycling, and walkability should be nurtured and celebrated, as it can unlock
Baltimore’s potential as a national leader in sustainable urban living.
Emerging Advocacy amid Stumbling Blocks
A key factor that has fostered BDOT’s ability to take a more
progressive approach is the increasing support among the general public for
complete streets and sustainable transportation infrastructure, particularly
for things like bike lanes and attractive surface transit that become an
integral and visible part of the public realm. New advocacy groups like RedLine Now, The Downtown Baltimore Family Alliance, and a newly formed Baltimore
cycling advocacy organization, are all prime examples of the growing interest
in urban living that relies less on driving and creates more hospitable
environments for walking, cycling, and transit.
A growing trend: Grassroots support for sustainable transportation options (source: gobaltimoreredline.com)
Despite its good efforts and intentions, BDOT can’t implement these innovative projects without broad public support. This was starkly illustrated last year when BDOT installed a bike lane on Monroe Street in West Baltimore by removing one of the travel lanes. Despite the street having a relatively low volume of car traffic, the bike lane was met with vocal community opposition and the lane was subsequently removed.
Then, just last month, BDOT developed plans for a Complete
Streets makeover for Midtown Baltimore through the Cultural Arts District. The
plan included reducing vehicle travel lanes on Mt. Royal Avenue from 4 to 2 so
that bike lanes could be added. The intention was to calm
traffic and improve safety, while promoting more cycling, walkability, and create
a better environment along the two urban college campuses which Mt. Royal
Avenue bisects: the Maryland Institute College of Art (MICA) and
University of Baltimore (UB). Careful technical analysis was done in advance to
ensure that these changes could be accommodated by the roadway system.
Mt. Royal Ave. birds eye view (source: bing.com) |
A Reflection of National Politics
The lingering resistance to changing our transportation
system in ways that create a more equitable balance for all users and travel
modes is really a microcosm of what is happening on the national stage right
now. Congress is working on the long overdue transportation reauthorization
bill. Earlier this month, the GOP controlled House was able to push through
elements of their version of the bill that completely eliminate funding for bicycle and pedestrian infrastructure projects as well as dedicated funding for public transit.
At the same time, the bill is full of provisions that will expand highways and oil drilling - a sure recipe for maintaining status quo car
dependence and an unsustainable energy and transportation future.
On the other side, the US DOT under visionary transportation
secretary Ray LaHood (himself a Republican) along with the Obama
Administration, have their own version of the bill with far reaching provisions for sustainable transportation at all levels – from high speed rail to bicycle
infrastructure.
Fortunately, like the rising clamor for sustainable
transportation options along Boston Street and in Midtown Baltimore, so has there
been an outcry for common sense to prevail and revise the transportation bill
on Capitol Hill to restore dedicated transit funding and bicycle/pedestrian
projects.
By most accounts, $5/gallon gas is right around the corner.
Perhaps that is what will finally compel skeptics who have not yet come to terms with economic realities to support transportation policy reform even if it means that
car-first attitudes and policies will no longer dominate as they have for more
than half a century.
Still, it’s hard to predict how it will play out in the
short term. Despite the delays, progress is being made.Getting to Complete Streets in Baltimore, and
ultimately a sustainable transportation policy framework for America is all but
inevitable, if for no other reason out of necessity. The real question is, “How
long will it take for us to get from here to there?”
The city has been painted into a corner on Boston Street by the crazy prospect of shoe-horning the Red Line onto a street where it very obviously does not fit. The option which would maintain two full lanes in each direction was truly awful, so the city really had little choice but to design it as they have.
ReplyDeleteThis will not be a Complete Street in any meaningful sense. The sketches I've seen interrupt the bike lanes at every left turn bay and bus stop. Bikers would be far better off using the local Canton streets, except the lane squeezes on Boston Street will inevitably push a huge volume of through traffic into the neighborhood. It would also help greatly if the city would promote true transit-oriented development, but the various projects in Harbor Point, Brewers Hill and Canton Crossing promise a continuation of auto-domination.
The Complete Streets plan for Boston Street is nothing but a Red Line ram-job. We'd all be far better off with a less ambitious transit plan that truly served community needs, was coordinated with proposed development and was part of an actual comprehensive interconnected regional transit system.
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
ReplyDelete